Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by establishing that they did not create the hazardous condition upon which the plaintiff allegedly slipped, or have actual or constructive notice of its existence for a sufficient length of time to discover and remedy it ( see Martinez v Khaimov, 74 AD3d 1031; Crapanzano v Balkon Realty Co., 68 AD3d 1042). The defendants' employee testified that she inspected the area where the plaintiff fell approximately 15 minutes before the accident, and observed no hazards ( see Mantzoutsos v 150 St. Produce Corp., 76 AD3d 549; Mauge v Barrow St. Ale House, 70 AD3d 1016; Crapanzano v Balkon Realty Co., 68 AD3d 1042; Yacouelli v Pathmark Stores, Inc., 67 AD3d 1002; Dennehy-Murphy v Nor-Topia Serv. Ctr., Inc., 61 AD3d 629; Collins v May fair Super Mkts., Inc., 13 AD3d 330). The plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition to the defendants' showing in this regard.
Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.