AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GALASSO, LANGIONE BOTTER, LLP, Respondent, v. ANTHONY P. GALASSO et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) GALASSO, LANGIONE BOTTER, LLP, et al., Respondents,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

"A motion for consolidation is addressed to the sound discretion of the court, and absent a showing of substantial prejudice by the party opposing the motion, consolidation is proper where there are common questions of law and fact" ( RCN Constr. Corp. v Fleet Bank, N.A., 34 AD3d 776, 777). Here, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the motion to consolidate, as there were no common questions of law and fact. The Supreme Court also providently exercised its discretion in granting the cross motion of the plaintiffs in action Nos. 1 and 2 to impose sanctions against the appellant ( see 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [c]; Tornheim v Blue White Food Prods. Corp., 73 AD3d 749).

[Prior Case History: 22 Misc 3d 1119(A), 2009 NY Slip Op 50184(U).]

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GALASSO v. GALASSO
(Feb 22, 2011)