AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SARI ZELMAN, Respondent, v. MARSHA MAURO et al., Appellants.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

The defendants met their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident ( see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Although the plaintiff was entitled to rely upon the unsworn medical reports of her doctors that were submitted by the defendants in support of their motion for summary judgment ( see Kearse v New York City Tr. Auth., 16 AD3d 45, 47 n 1 [2005]), these reports were insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SARI ZELMAN v. MARSHA MAURO
(Feb 22, 2011)