AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

James R. MEIRHOFER; Ann L. Meirhofer, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SMITH'S FOOD AND DRUG CENTERS INC., doing business as Fry's Food and Drug Stores, Inc. doing business as Fry's Food Stores, Inc.; Kroger Company, Defendants-Appellees.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

James Meirhofer appeals from the district court's summary judgment in favor of his employer on his hostile work environment claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. The facts are known to the parties and will not be repeated here except to the extent necessary.

Assuming, arguendo, that hostile work environment claims are cognizable under the ADA, we conclude that Meirhofer's allegations do not rise to the level of "a discriminatorily hostile or abusive environment." Harris v. Forklift Sys., Inc., 510 U.S. 17, 21, 114 S.Ct. 367, 126 L.Ed.2d 295 (1993). At most, the derogatory nickname and occasional insulting comments constituted "simple teasing" and "isolated incidents" and were not sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the terms and conditions of his employment and create an abusive work environment. Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775, 788, 118 S.Ct. 2275, 141 L.Ed.2d 662 (1998).

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MEIRHOFER v. SMITH'S FOOD AND DRUG CTRS
(Feb 23, 2011)