Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by

ANN MARIE RUDD, MATTHEW ROACH, MELISSA LONGO, JENNIFER DOTY, and GARRETT TITCHEN, Plaintiffs, v. T.L. CANNON CORP., d/b/a Applebees, T.L. CANNON MANAGEMENT CORP., TLC WEST, LLC, TLC CENTRAL, LLC, TLC UTICA, LLC, TLC EAST, LLC, TLC NORTH, LLC, DAVID A. STEIN, MATTHEW J. FAIRBAIRN, and JOHN A. PERRY, Defendants.

DECISION and ORDER

THOMAS McAVOY, District Judge

This matter is brought pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 201, and was referred to the Hon. David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report-Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c).

No objections to the January 4, 2011 Report-Recommendation have been raised. After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, this Court adopts the Report-Recommendation for the reasons stated therein.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that:

(1) Certification of this action as a collective action for purposes of the FLSA is GRANTED IN PART, as stated in Judge Peebles' Report-Recommendation; (2) Plaintiffs' motion for class certification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 with regard to the claims under New York Labor Law are DENIED without prejudice; (3) Plaintiffs are permitted to engage in discovery initially focusing upon the Rule 23 certifications issues; and (4) The parties negotiate and submit to the Court, within thirty days, either a form collective action notice acceptable to both parties or, alternatively, counter-proposed language for inclusion in such a notice. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 3, 2011

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RUDD v. T.L. CANNON CORP
(Mar 3, 2011)