AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions

SANG K. PYUN, Plaintiff, v. PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

ORDER

R. PROCTOR, District Judge

This case is before the court on Defendant The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company's ("Paul Revere") Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 34), Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company's ("Metropolitan") Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 36), Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment on the Counterclaim Filed by Defendants (Doc. # 41), Defendants' Motion to Strike Testimony of Dr. C.E. Herrington (Doc. # 58), and Defendants' Motion to Strike Testimony and Report of Lynn Hare Phillips (Doc. # 73). Consistent with the Memorandum Opinion entered contemporaneously herewith, Defendant Paul Revere's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 34) is GRANTED, Defendant Metropolitan's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 36) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment on the Counterclaim Filed by Defendants (Doc. # 41) is DENIED, Defendants' Motion to Strike Testimony of Dr. C.E. Herrington (Doc. # 58) is OVERRULED AS MOOT, and Defendants' Motion to Strike Testimony and Report of Lynn Hare Phillips (Doc. # 73) is OVERRULED AS MOOT. Because no claims remain as to Defendant Paul Revere, Defendant Paul Revere is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

The court will enter a separate order setting this case for a pretrial conference.

DONE and ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PYUN v. PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
(Mar 3, 2011)