AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

IRASEMA DE LA CRUZ DE LA CRUZ, et al, Plaintiffs, v. GULF COAST MARINE ASSOCIATES, INC, et al, Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

T. WARD, District Judge

Pending before the Court is Baker Hughes Incorporated's ("Baker Hughes") Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Motion for More Definite Statement (Dkt. No. 118). In its motion, Baker Hughes argues that other than naming Baker Hughes as a party in paragraph 20 of the Second Amended Complaint, Baker Hughes is never again mentioned in the Second Amended Complaint. As a result, Baker Hughes argues that Plaintiffs' allegations fail to meet the minimum pleading standard articulated in Bell Atlantic v. Twombly. 127 U.S. 1955 (2007). Since filing its Motion to Dismiss, Baker Hughes has been dismissed from the case (Dkt. No. 145). Although Halliburton moved to join in Baker Hughes' Motion to Dismiss and Motion for More Definite Statement, the arguments made in that motion are unique to Baker Hughes and cannot be transferred to Halliburton. Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES-AS-MOOT Baker Hughes' Motion to Dismiss and Motion for a More Definite Statement (Dkt. No. 118).

It is SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 7th day of March, 2011.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DE LA CRUZ v. GULF COAST MARINE ASSOC
(Mar 7, 2011)