Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,
Ordered that judgment is reversed insofar as cross-appealed from, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for a new calculation and award of prejudgment interest in accordance herewith, and for the entry of an appropriate amended judgment; and it is further,
Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff.
As a result of the defendants' legal malpractice, which is not contested on this appeal, the plaintiffs house was sold at a foreclosure sale on April 4, 2002. The plaintiff and his wife held title to the subject property as tenants by the entirety and were, thus, each seized of the whole property ( see Kahn v Kahn, 43 NY2d 203, 206-207; Stelz v Shreck, 128 NY 263, 266 [1891]; Paterno v CYC, LLC, 46 AD3d 788, 789). Since the plaintiff owned the entire property, the Supreme Court properly held that he was entitled to recover 100% of the lost equity in the property.
We agree with the plaintiffs contention that May 1, 2003, is not a "reasonable intermediate date" from which to calculate prejudgment interest (CPLR 5001 [b]). Instead, we find that April 4, 2002, is a "single reasonable intermediate date" (CPLR 5001 [b]) from which to calculate prejudgment interest on the damages awarded in this case. Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for a new calculation and award of prejudgment interest, and for the entry of an appropriate amended judgment.
[Prior Case History: 26 Misc 3d 1211(A), 2010 NY Slip Op 50064(U).]