AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of RAHEEM OLIVER, Petitioner, v. BRIAN FISCHER, Commissioner, New York State Department of Correctional Ser

It is hereby ordered that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.

Memorandum:

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the determination, following a tier III hearing, that he violated inmate rule 113.10 ( 7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [i] [weapon possession]). Contrary to petitioner's contention, the determination is supported by substantial evidence. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the correction officer who wrote it and the photographs of the shanks found in a light fixture, constitutes substantial evidence supporting the determination that petitioner violated inmate rule 113.10 ( see generally Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964, 966; People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130, 140).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE OLIVER v. BRIAN FISCHER
(Mar 25, 2011)