The finding that respondent was mentally ill within the meaning of Social Services Law § 384-b (4) (c) and (6) (a) was supported by clear and convincing evidence. The agency presented uncontroverted testimony from a psychologist who, after reviewing respondent's medical records, found that she suffered from schizoaffective disorder. This rendered her incapable of caring for the child presently and for the foreseeable future ( see Matter of Roberto A. [Altagracia A], 73 AD3d 501, 501, lv denied 15 NY3d 703).
Given the psychologist's unrebutted testimony and respondent's repeated requests for adjournments, the lapse in time between the psychological evaluation and the fact-finding hearing does not warrant a different result ( see Matter of Robert K., 56 AD3d 353, lv denied 12 NY3d 704).
A dispositional hearing was not necessary to find that termination of respondent's parental rights is in the child's best interests ( see Matter of Ashanti A, 56 AD3d 373, 374).