AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GOD'S BATTALION OF PRAYER PENTECOSTAL CHURCH, INC., Appellant-Respondent, v. LARRY B. HOLLANDER et al., Respondents-Appellants, and ROPAL CONSTRUCTION CORP. et al., Respondents.

Ordered that the appeal from the order entered September 1, 2009, is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further, Ordered that the order entered November 16, 2009, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action ( see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment ( see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

Contrary to the plaintiffs contentions, the Supreme Court properly dismissed its complaint ( see CPLR 3211 [a] [3], [5], [7]). Further, the Supreme Court providently denied both the first and second cross motions of the defendants Larry B. Hollander, Hollander Strauss, LLP, and Hollander Strauss, as successor to Hollander, Strauss Mastropietro, LLP, for an award of sanctions against the plaintiff and its counsel ( see 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [c]).

[Prior Case History: 24 Misc 3d 1250(A), 2009 NY Slip Op 51939(U).]

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GOD'S BATTALION OF PRAYER PENT v. HOLLANDER
(Mar 29, 2011)