Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN ROBERT BROWN, Defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CHERYL ZWART, Magistrate Judge

At the Defendant's oral request and with the parties' consent,

IT IS ORDERED:

1) The defendant's Motion Hearing is continued to May 19, 2011 at 1:00 p.m.
2) The ends of justice served by granting defendant's request to continue the motion hearing outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, and the additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, the time between today's date and May 19, 2011, shall be deemed excluded in any computation of time under the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, for the reason that defendant's counsel requires additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, the novelty and complexity of the case, and the fact that the failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

U.S. v. BROWN
(Apr 1, 2011)