Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Attorney(S)

JOEL MURRAY, Plaintiff, v. *DR. RAMINENI, Medical Director; *A. FERGUSON, N.P.; *DR. MANNAVA, M.D.; *PICENTE, Correction Counselor; STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; *NURSE HOWARD; *WILLIAMS, Nurse; A. PAOLANO, Dr., Great Meadow Correctional Facility; and *J. HARRIS, Nurse Administrator, *All of Mid-State Correctional Facility, Defendants.

DECISION and ORDER

DAVID HURD, District Judge

Plaintiff, Joel Murray, commenced this civil rights action in July 2008, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By Report-Recommendation dated March 3, 2011, the Honorable David R. Homer, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 57) be granted as to all federal claims and all defendants; that Murray's state law claims be dismissed without prejudice; and that this action be terminated. (Docket No. 71). The plaintiff has filed objections to the Report-Recommendation. (Docket No. 72).

Based upon a de novo review of the entire file, including the portions of the Report-Recommendation to which plaintiff has objected, and the recommendations of Magistrate Judge Homer, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects.See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1).

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that

1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 57) is GRANTED;

2. The plaintiff's federal law claims are DISMISSED with prejudice;

3. The plaintiff's state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice; and

4. The Clerk is directed to file judgment accordingly and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MURRAY v. RAMINENI
(Apr 1, 2011)