Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

MICHAEL ALONZO HARRIS, Petitioner, v. BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) FEDERAL, Respondent.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

DAVID CERCONE, District Judge

On April 5, 2010, the above captioned case was initiated by the filing of a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 14) filed on March 1, 2011, recommended that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied. Petitioner was served with the Report and Recommendation and was advised he was allowed fourteen (14) days to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed. After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 1ST day of April, 2011;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 14) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED. AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Petitioner has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HARRIS v. BUREAU OF PRISONS
(Apr 4, 2011)