Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

THOMAS K. TURNER v. MR. JESSE KIRSCH, et al.

ORDER

MITCHELL GOLDBERG, District Judge

AND NOW, this 12th day of April, 2011, upon consideration of the Motions for Summary Judgment of Defendants Paula Dillman-McGowan, Joetta Kline, Cynthia Sheldon, Drue Wagner, Jesse Kirsch and Erik Von Kiel, (Doc. Nos. 74-75, 77), and Plaintiff's responses thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Defendant "Paula Dillman-McGowan's Motion for Summary Judgment" (Doc. No. 74) is DENIED, such that Plaintiff may proceed on his 28 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against Paula Dillman-McGowan, consistent with the Court's Memorandum Opinion;
2. "Defendants Joetta Kline, Cynthia Sheldon, and Drue Wagner's Motion for Summary Judgment" (Doc. No. 75) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, such that Plaintiff may proceed on his 28 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against Cynthia Sheldon, consistent with the Court's Memorandum Opinion;
3. The "Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant Jesse Kirsch" (Doc. No. 77) is GRANTED;
4. "Defendant Dr. Erik Von Kiel's Motion for Summary Judgment" (Doc. No. 86) is DENIED, such that Plaintiff may proceed to trial on his 28 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against Paula Dillman-McGowan, consistent with the Court's Memorandum Opinion.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TURNER v. KIRSCH
(Apr 13, 2011)