AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CARMEN TEJEDA, Appellant, v. CHERISE M. DYAL, M.D., et al., Respondents.

Dismissal of this action pursuant to CPLR 3404 was improper. Here, when the note of issue was previously vacated, the case reverted to its pre-note of issue status, thereby rendering CPLR 3404 inapplicable ( see Sellitto v Women's Health Care Specialists, 58 AD3d 828; Johnson v Minskoff Sons, 287 AD2d 233). Defendants' avenues to dismiss this pre-note of issue case are limited to CPLR 3216 and 22 NYCRR 202.27. The latter is inapplicable to the facts herein, and defendants failed to comply with the preconditions of the former ( see Johnson at 237-238).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TEJEDA v. CHERISE M. DYAL, M.D
(Apr 19, 2011)