AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of JUDY LAPHAM, Respondent, v. DANIELLE OSIK, Appellant.

Ordered that the order dated February 5, 2010, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the mother's contentions, the evidence adduced at the hearing established, beyond a reasonable doubt, that she willfully violated a prior order of the court by depriving the paternal grandmother of certain visitation time with the subject child ( see Matter of Rubackin v Rubackin, 62 AD3d 11, 15; cf. Matter of Dorf v Alvalle, 76 AD3d 629; Matter of Anonymous v Anonymous, 222 AD2d 501).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE JUDY LAPHAM
(Apr 19, 2011)