Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
On October 16, 2006, the plaintiff allegedly was injured when she slipped and fell on a slippery substance in a pizzeria owned by the defendant. In January 2009, the plaintiff commenced this action by filing a summons and complaint with the West-chester County Clerk.
It is undisputed that the plaintiff failed to comply with CPLR 306-b, as she failed to effect service upon the defendant within the 120-day period allowed by that statute ( see Leader v Maroney, Ponzini Spencer, 97 NY2d 95, 101; Calloway v Wells, 79 AD3d 786; Bumpus v New York City Tr. Auth., 66 AD3d 26). To the extent that the plaintiff attempted to informally seek leave to effect late service of the original summons and complaint upon the defendant pursuant to CPLR 306-b, that affirmative relief should have been sought in a notice of cross motion to the Supreme Court ( see Rinaldi v Rochford, 77 AD3d 720) and, in any event, the plaintiff did not demonstrate the existence of facts that would support the granting of such relief ( see Williams v Nassau County Med. Ctr., 6 NY3d 531; Calloway v Wells, 79 AD3d at 787; Redman v South Is. Orthopaedic Group, P.C., 78 AD3d 1147, lv denied 16 NY3d 707; Rinaldi v Rochford, 77 AD3d at 720).
The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 306-b.