AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

ALTSHULER SHAHAM PROVIDENT FUNDS, LTD., Appellant, v. GML TOWER LLC, et al., Defendants, and THE PIKE COMPANY, INC., et al., Respondents.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court ( Altshuler Shaham Provident Funds, Ltd. v GML Tower LLC, 28 Misc 3d 475). We add only that we do not address plaintiffs contention that the 2007 Loan Agreement was a preliminary agreement that expired before the mortgage at issue was filed. That contention is raised for the first time on appeal and "`could have been obviated or cured by factual showings or legal countersteps'" in Supreme Court ( Oram v Capone, 206 AD2d 839, 840).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ALTSHULER SHAHAM PROVIDENT v. GML TOWER
(Apr 29, 2011)