Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CARL WHITE Defendant.

DECISION and ORDER

CHARLES SIRAGUSA, District Judge

This case was referred by order of the undersigned, dated December 14, 2010, to Magistrate Judge Marian W. Payson, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A)-(B). Defendant filed an omnibus pretrial motion seeking, inter alia, an order dismissing the one count indictment as duplicitous. On April 14, 2011, Magistrate Judge Payson filed a Report and Recommendation ("R R") (#23) recommending that the Court deny defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment as duplicitous. Defendant timely filed objections (# 24) to the R R on April 28, 2011.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the R R to which objections have been made. Upon a de novo review of the R R and after considering the defendant's objections, the Court accepts the proposed findings and recommendation.

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Payson's R R (#23), the defendant's motion (#16) to dismiss the indictment as duplicitous is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

U.S. v. WHITE
(May 2, 2011)