AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of BEVERLY RILEY, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Appellants.

We find the penalty so disproportionate as to be shocking to our sense of fairness ( see Lackow v Department of Educ. [or "Board"] of City of N.Y., 51 AD3d 563, 569). The student admitted that she sustained no physical or emotional injury as a result of the incident, and in the 15 years preceding the incident, petitioner had received not a single formal reproach ( compare Matter of Weinstein v Department of Educ. of City of N.Y., 19 AD3d 165, lv denied 6 NY3d 706, Matter of Solis v Department of Educ. of City of N.Y., 30 AD3d 532, and Gabriel v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2009 NY Slip Op 32249[U], with Matter of Ebner v Board of Educ. of E. Williston Union Free School Dist. No. 2, N Hempstead, 42 NY2d 938).

[Prior Case History: 2010 NY Slip Op 32540(U).]

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE BEVERLY RILEY
(May 3, 2011)