Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Family Court's finding that the father neglected the child Kahi G. by using excessive corporal punishment was supported by a preponderance of the evidence ( see Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [B]; see also Matter of Maria Raquel L., 36 AD3d 425; Matter of Joshua B., 28 AD3d 759; Matter of Joseph O., 28 AD3d 562; Matter of Alysha M., 24 AD3d 255; Matter of Sheneika V., 20 AD3d 541; Matter of Jonathan W., 17 AD3d 374; Matter of Johannah QQ., 266 AD2d 769; Matter of Suffolk County Dept. of Social Servs. v Nicole S., 266 AD2d 556). Furthermore, the father's excessive corporal punishment of Kahi G. demonstrated a fundamental defect in the father's understanding of his parental duties and, therefore, constituted derivative neglect as to Abigail G. ( see Family Ct Act § 1046 [a] [i]; see also Matter of Jasmine A., 18 AD3d 546, 547).