AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF v. JOSE DAVID SALCIDO DEFENDANT.

ORDER

DAVID BUNNING, District Judge

This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation ("R R") of the United States Magistrate Judge wherein he recommends that the Court revoke Defendant's supervised release and impose a sentence of four (4) months imprisonment with no supervised release to follow. (Doc. # 7). During the evidentiary hearing conducted by Magistrate Judge Wehrman on May 12, 2011, Defendant orally stipulated to violating the terms of his supervised release as set out in the March 12, 2011 violation report. (Doc. # 7).

Defendant having executed a waiver of his right to allocution (Doc. # 6), there being no objections filed to the Magistrate Judge's R R, and the time to do so having now expired, the R R is ripe for the Court's consideration. Having reviewed the R R, and the Court concluding that the R R is sound in all respects, including the recommended sentence and the basis for said recommendation, and the Court being otherwise sufficiently advised, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

(1) the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 7) is hereby ADOPTED as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Court;
(2) Defendant is found to have VIOLATED the terms of his supervised release;
(3) Defendant's supervised release is hereby REVOKED;
(4) Defendant is sentenced to the CUSTODY of the Attorney General for a period of four (4) months with no supervised release to follow; and
(5) A Judgment shall be entered contemporaneously herewith.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

U.S. v. SALCIDO
(Jun 1, 2011)