WENDY HAZEN v. BD. OF EDUC. OF CITY, N.Y., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Wendy Hazen, appellant pro se. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City ( Julian L. Kalkstein of counsel), for respondents.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

WENDY HAZEN v. BD. OF EDUC. OF CITY

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Jun 2, 2011

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Wendy Hazen, appellant pro se. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City ( Julian L. Kalkstein of counsel), for respondents.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

WENDY HAZEN, Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals ( 22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs ( see Matter of Hickey v New York City Dept. of Educ., 17 NY3d — 2011 NY Slip Op 04541 [2011] [decided today]).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

WENDY HAZEN v. BD. OF EDUC. OF CITY

WENDY HAZEN, Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents.

Comments