AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions

MISTY DAWN BELL, indi v. dually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,

ORDER

KEVIN SHARP, District Judge

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, the Court rules as follows:

(1) Defendant Providence Community Corrections Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 11) is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff Misty Dawn Bell's claims under the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act, the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act, and her unidentified tort claims, but DENIED with respect to her claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

(2) Defendant's Motion to Strike (Docket No. 13) is hereby DENIED.

It is SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BELL v. PROVIDENCE COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS, INC. (M.D.Tenn. 6-7-2011)
(Jun 7, 2011)