Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
"The determination of whether a family offense was committed is a factual issue to be resolved by the hearing court ( see Family Ct Act §§ 812, 832; Matter of Halper v Halper, 61 AD3d 687; Matter of Lallmohamed v Lallmohamed, 23 AD3d 562), and that court's determination regarding the credibility of witnesses is entitled to great weight on appeal unless clearly unsupported by the record" ( Matter of Creighton v Whit-more, 71 AD3d 1141; see Matter of Kaur v Singh, 73 AD3d 1178; Matter of Gray v Gray, 55 AD3d 909). Here, contrary to the appellant's contention, a "fair preponderance" (Family Ct Act § 832) of the credible evidence supported the hearing court's determination that he committed the family offense of harassment in the second degree, warranting the issuance of an order of protection ( see Family Ct Act § 832; Penal Law § 240.26; Matter of Jessica C. v Esteban B., 13 AD3d 183; People v Sylla, 7 Misc 3d 8, 10).