To the extent that petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus, the petition is hereby denied because he has failed to show that no other adequate legal remedy is available. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000). To the extent that petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition, the petition is hereby denied because petitioner has failed to demonstrate that an entity or tribunal is attempting to act in excess of its jurisdiction.See Mandico v. Taos Constr., Inc., 605 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 1992); English v. McCrary, 348 So. 2d 293 (Fla. 1977). Accordingly, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Writ of Prohibition is denied.
CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur. QUINCE, J., recused.