AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of HASSAN ABDUL-MALIK, Petitioner, v. GREGORY J. PALIN, as Hearing Officer, Respondent.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination rendered after a tier II disciplinary hearing. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. While petitioner also seeks to be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary determination, he is not entitled to such relief ( see Matter of Williams v Fischer, 81 AD3d 1021, 1022.]; Matter of Arroyo v Fischer, 77 AD3d 1002, 1003). Consequently, given that petitioner has been granted all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition is dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Murphy v Boucaud, 78 AD3d 1417; Matter of Avincola v Fischer, 74 AD3d 1672, lv denied 15 NY3d 711).

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE HASSAN ABDUL-MALIK
(Jun 16, 2011)