Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of J.M. Lloyd C. Suhr, Assistant State's Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee v. J.M., Respondent and Appellant.

Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] J.M. appeals from a trial court order denying his petition for discharge and continuing his commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. He argues the State did not prove by clear and convincing evidence he has serious difficulty controlling his behavior and remains a sexually dangerous individual. We conclude the trial court did not clearly err in denying J.M.'s petition for discharge and affirm the trial court's order under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE J.M
(Jun 21, 2011)