AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

TOWER INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, et al v. DOCKSIDE ASSOCIATES PIER 30 LP, et al.

ORDER

TIMOTHY SAVAGE, District Judge

AND NOW, this 6th day of July, 2011, upon consideration of the Motion of Plaintiffs, Tower Insurance Company of New York and Everest National Insurance Company, for Summary Judgment (Document No. 33), the defendants' response and the plaintiffs' reply, it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED.

It is DECLARED that Tower Insurance Company of New York and Everest National Insurance Company have no duty to defend or to indemnify Dockside Associates Pier 30 L.P. or DePaul Management Company for any claims arising out of the action filed against them in the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas for Philadelphia County captioned Forceno, et al v. Dockside Assoc. Pier 30 LP, et al, December Term 2009, No. 1297.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TOWER INS. CO. OF N.Y. v. DOCKSIDE ASSOCIATES PIER 30 LP
(Jul 7, 2011)