AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions

JIRI PIK v. THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al.

ORDER

MARY McLAUGHLIN, District Judge

AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2011, upon consideration of the defendant the University of Pennsylvania's Motion for Sanctions and Protective Order (Docket No. 42), and the opposition thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, for the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing today's date, that:

1. The Motion for Sanctions is GRANTED. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and shall be marked as closed for statistical purposes.

2. The Motion for Protective Order is DENIED AS MOOT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PIK v. UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
(Aug 1, 2011)