Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

SCOTT O'RILEY, Plaintiff Below-Appellant, v. SHAWN ROGERS, Defendant Below-Appellee.

ORDER

RANDY J. HOLLAND, Justice.

This 21st day of September 2011, it appears to the Court that:

(1) The plaintiff-appellant, Scott O'Riley, has petitioned this Court, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 42, to accept an appeal from the interlocutory order of the Superior Court dated August 30, 2011, which granted the post-trial motion of the defendant-appellee, Shawn Rogers, for a new trial on the issue of damages.

(2) O'Riley filed his application for certification to take an interlocutory appeal in the Superior Court on September 1, 2011. On September 15, 2011, the Superior Court denied the application on the ground that the requirements of Rule 42 had not been met.

(3) Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the sound discretion of this Court. In the exercise of its discretion, the Court has concluded that O'Riley's application for interlocutory review does not meet the requirements of Supreme Court Rule 42 and, therefore, should be denied.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the interlocutory appeal is DENIED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

O'RILEY v. ROGERS
(Sep 21, 2011)