Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

LINNEA MARAVELL, Plaintiff v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner Of Social Security, Defendant

George Z. Singal

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on September 29, 2011, his Recommended Decision (Docket No. 19). Plaintiff filed her Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 20) on October 17, 2011. Defendant filed his Response to Plaintiff's Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 23) on October 28, 2011.

I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED.
2. It is hereby ORDERED that the Decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.


George Z. Singal


U.S. District Judge


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Maravell v. Astrue
(Nov 1, 2011)