AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WARREN CLIFTON PIERCE.

ORDER

DAVID BRAMLETTE III, District Judge

Before the Court is a Motion by the United States of America to forego Restitution inasmuch as information, data and figures necessary to reasonably calculate the amount of restitution are unavailable for the reasons set forth in the Motion. Having conducted a telephonic conference with the United States and with Defense counsel and after careful review and being satisfied that the Motion is well taken, the Court finds as provided in § 3663A(c)(3)(B) that the issues of fact relating to the victims' losses are complex; the victims cannot be determined and/or located after a reasonable effort by the United States; and the need to provide restitution is outweighed by the burden on the sentencing process.

WHEREFORE, no restitution is ordered.

THIS THE 1st day of November, 2011.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

U.S. v. PIERCE
(Nov 2, 2011)