AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

GENERAC POWER SYSTEMS INC., Plaintiff-Counter-Claim Defendant, -vs- KOHLER CO., Defendant-Counterclaimant.

DECISION AND ORDER

RUDOLPH T. RANDA, U.S. District Judge

This matter comes before the Court on the motion filed by the Plaintiff Generac Power Systems Inc. ("Generac") to lift the Court's order staying these proceedings pending the completion of the two reexamination proceedings before the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") regarding the '345 patent's validity. The basis for its motion is that the PTO has decided that both applications for reexamination lack merit. Defendant Kohler Co. opposes that motion asserting that neither reexamination proceeding is complete.

This Court's order granting the stay weighed the interests of both parties and concluded that a stay of this action pending conclusion of the PTO reexaminations was appropriate. Reexamination of a patent is only complete upon the PTO's issuance of a certification canceling or confirming the patent. See 35 U.S.C. § 316; 37 C.F.R. § 1.997(a). Such certificates cannot issue until all appeals are concluded. See id.

Generac acknowledges that Kohler may appeal the inter partes reexamination decision to the Board of Patent Appeals. Kohler has indicated that it will do so once the examiner issues a Right of Appeal Notice. The inter partes reexamination is therefore not complete, and Generac's motion to lift the stay is denied.

NOW, THEREFORE, BASED ON THE FOREGOING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

Generac's motion to lift the stay (Docket No. 48) is DENIED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GENERAC POWER SYSTEMS INC. v. KOHLER CO
(Nov 29, 2011)