Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THURMOND McMICHAEL, Plaintiff v. ANDREW PALLITO, ROBERT KUPEC, JAY SIMONS, PHIL FERNANDEZ, STAN MORSE, DAVID BULEY, STEPHEN McCARTHY and BARBARA LESTER, Defendants.

ORDER

J. Garvan Murtha, United States District Judge.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was filed October 24, 2011. (Doc. 93.) After de novo review and absent objection, the Report and Recommendation is AFFIRMED, APPROVED and ADOPTED. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 83) is GRANTED. To the extent Plaintiff's opposition memorandum (Doc. 87) is an opposing motion, it is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED. Plaintiff's motion to compel (Doc. 84) is DENIED as moot.

It is further certified that any appeal taken in forma pauperis from this Order would not be taken in good faith because such an appeal would be frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

McMICHAEL v. PALLITO
(Dec 1, 2011)