Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Karen M. BROWN, Respondent, v. Anthony T. BROWN, Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Charles County, 0711–FC00455–02 & 0911–FC1389, Ted House, Judge.Karen S. Little, O'Fallon, MO, for appellant. Karen M. Brown, St. Louis, MO, for respondent. Before: CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J. and GARY M. GAERTNER, Jr., J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony T. Brown appeals from the trial court's judgment granting his Family Access Motion and motions for contempt and to modify child support, but denying his motion to modify child custody. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the trial court's decision is supported by substantial evidence and does not erroneously declare the law, Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976), and is not an abuse of discretion, Andrews v. Andrews, 344 S.W.3d 749, 749 (Mo.App. E.D.2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2011).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Brown v. Brown
(Mar 27, 2012)