AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

ANTHONY WASHINGTON, Petitioner, v. JEFFREY BEARD, Commissioner, Pennsyl

LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.

THIS IS A CAPITAL CASE
ORDER

AND NOW, this 27th day of March 2012, upon consideration of the Respondent's Motion In Limine in Light of the Recent Decision in Cullen v. Pinholster (Doc. No. 87) and all responses and replies thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

It is FURTHER ORDERED, upon consideration of the Respondent's Motion to Preclude the Expert Testimony of Dr. Steven Penrod (Doc. No. 86) and Petitioner's Response thereto (Doc. No. 93), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is DENIED without prejudice with the right to object after a Daubert hearing, which will be scheduled in a subsequent court Order.

BY THE COURT:

__________________


LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Washington v. Beard
(Mar 27, 2012)