AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

QUINTIN L. HOLMES, Petitioner, v. STEVE RIVARD, Respondent.

PATRICK J. DUGGAN

Honorable Patrick J. Duggan
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION TO HOLD HABEAS
PETITION IN ABEYANCE AND CLOSING CASE

Quintin L. Holmes ("Holmes") is a Michigan prisoner incarcerated at the St. Louis Correctional Facility in St. Louis, Michigan. On March 8, 2012, Holmes submitted to the Clerk of this Court a pro se motion to hold a habeas petition in abeyance while he pursues state remedies. Holmes did not sign his motion, and he did not pay the filing fee for a habeas action or apply for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. More significantly, Holmes does not have a habeas corpus petition pending in this court. In fact, a search of the United States Courts' PACER system reflects that Holmes has not filed a habeas corpus petition in any federal court.

Before the Court can resolve the motion for a stay, Holmes must file a habeas corpus petition and either pay the filing fee for the action or seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Until then, Holmes' motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. In the copy of this Order to be served on Holmes, the Court is enclosing a form petition for the writ of habeas corpus and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. If Holmes intends to seek habeas corpus relief in this court, he must complete and sign the petition and return it for filing. With the petition, Holmes also must submit the $5.00 filing fee or a signed and completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. This case is closed.

The Court notes that Holmes' motion fails to provide sufficient information to determine whether "stay and abeyance" is appropriate. Pursuant to Supreme Court precedent, this procedure should be utilized "only in limited circumstances where the petitioner has shown good cause for his failure to exhaust state remedies." Hodge v. Haeberlin, 579 F.3d 627, 638 (6th Cir. 2009) (citing Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269, 277, 125 S. Ct. 1528 (2005)).

SO ORDERED.

PATRICK J. DUGGAN


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Copy to:


Quintin L. Holmes, #582748


St. Louis Correctional Facility


8585 N. Croswell Road


St. Louis, MI 48880


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Holmes v. Rivard
(May 1, 2012)