AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BREYON HARE Defendant.

C. Darnell Jones, II

ORDER

AND NOW, this 1st day of March, 2013, it is hereby ORDERED that the following Motions are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: Defendant's Motion for Early Production of Jencks Act Materials (Doc. No. 15); Defendant's Motions for Disclosure of Exculpatory Evidence (Doc. Nos. 16 & 22); Defendant's Motions for Bill of Particulars (Doc. Nos. 21 & 23); Defendant's Motion for Government Agents to Retain Rough Notes (Doc. No. 24); and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Indictment (Doc. No. 25).

It appears as though counsel intended to file a Memorandum of Law in support of Defendant's Motion for Bill of Particulars but instead, filed the Motion twice.

On February 20, 2013, new counsel was appointed to represent Defendant in the above-captioned matter. Upon full review of the case, said counsel shall be permitted to file those motions he deems appropriate, in accordance with the Case Management Order issued this same day.
--------

BY THE COURT:

C. Darnell Jones, II J.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

United States v. Hare
(Mar 1, 2013)