Gregory F. Van Tatenhove
ORDER
This matter is before the Court for review of the Recommended Disposition of United States Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram filed on August 9, 2012. [R. 22.] His Report and Recommendation advises the parties that any objections must be filed within fourteen days of service. [Id. at 34.] As of this date, neither party has filed objections or sought an extension of time to do so.
Generally, the Court must make a de novo determination of those portions of a recommended disposition to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). When no objections are made, however, this Court is not required to "review . . . a magistrate's factual or legal conclusion, under a de novo or any other standard . . . ." Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Parties who fail to object to a Magistrate's report and recommendation are also barred from appealing a district court's order adopting that report and recommendation. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). Nevertheless, this Court has examined the record, and it agrees with the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Disposition and the grounds articulated therein.
Accordingly, and the Court being sufficiently advised, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
(1) The Recommended Disposition [R. 22] of United States Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram is ADOPTED in full and INCORPORATED herein by reference as and for the Opinion of the Court; and
(2) Pro se Petitioner Simon Oliver's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [R. 5] is DENIED; and
(4) Judgment will be entered contemporaneously with this Order in favor of the Respondent.
Signed By:
Gregory F. Van Tatenhove
United States District Judge