AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

GREGORY and MICHELLE BAIRD, Plaintiffs, v. DOLGENCORP, L.L.C. and DOLGENCORP, INC., Defendants and, Third Party Plaintiffs,

David D. Noce

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of third party Hogan Dedicated Services LLC to quash deposition subpoena (Doc. 146) is sustained, for the reasons set forth in the Order Vacating Deposition filed on February 28, 2013 (Doc. 149).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of third party defendant Lincoln County Shopping Center LLC for reconsideration or for clarification of the court's order of December 4, 2012, (Docs. 121, 123, 124) are sustained. The court has reconsidered the earlier ruling, but after such reconsideration the subject order remains in effect. In that order, the court concluded that Lincoln County Shopping Center had a duty under its lease agreement to maintain the lighting in the area where Gregory Baird's alleged injury occurred, and that this conclusion did not resolve the allegations of negligence made by Dolgencorp and Lincoln County Shopping Center against each other. The jury will decide, given all the relevant facts, whether either Dolgencorp or Lincoln County Shopping Center, or both, were negligent in failing to provide adequate lighting in the area where Mr. Baird was allegedly injured and whether this negligence caused him injury.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of Dolgencorp to strike (Doc. 125) is denied as moot.

David D. Noce


UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Baird v. Dolgencorp, L.L.C.
(Mar 1, 2013)