AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MONDIS TECHNOLOGY LTD., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. INNOLUX CORPORATION (FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHIMEI INNOLUX CORPORATION) AND INNOLUX CORP., Defendants, AND HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD., Mo

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 11-CV-0378, Judge J. Rodney Gilstrap.

JUDGMENT

MARTIN J. BLACK, Dechert LLP, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for the plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were JEFFREY B. PLIES and VINCENT A. GALLO.

PETER J. WIED, Goodwin Procter LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for movant-appellant. With him on the brief were TERRY D. GARNETT, VINCENT K. YIP, and JAY C. CHIU. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PROST, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

______________________


Daniel E. O'Toole


Clerk


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Mondis Tech. Ltd. v. Innolux Corp.
(Sep 13, 2013)