AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Rebecca CHUSID, respondent, v. Daniel SILVERA, appellant.

REINALDO E. RIVERA


Alexander Potruch, LLC, Garden City, N.Y., for appellant. Anthony A. Capetola, Williston Park, N.Y. (Robert P. Johnson of counsel), for respondent.
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., RUTH C. BALKIN, JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, and JEFFREY A. COHEN, JJ.



In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Janowitz, J.), dated October 24, 2012, as granted the plaintiff's motion for an award of interim counsel fees in the sum of $100,000.

ORDERED that the order is modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, by deleting the provision thereof granting the plaintiff's motion for an award of interim counsel fees in the sum of $100,000, and substituting therefor a provision granting the plaintiff's motion to the extent of awarding her interim counsel fees in the sum of $75,000, and otherwise denying the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

“An award of interim counsel fees ensures that the nonmonied spouse will be able to litigate the action, and do so on equal footing with the monied spouse” ( Prichep v. Prichep, 52 A.D.3d 61, 65, 858 N.Y.S.2d 667;see O'Shea v. O'Shea, 93 N.Y.2d 187, 193, 689 N.Y.S.2d 8, 711 N.E.2d 193;Meltzer v. Meltzer, 63 A.D.3d 702, 703, 882 N.Y.S.2d 422;Wald v. Wald, 44 A.D.3d 848, 850, 844 N.Y.S.2d 86). Here, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in awarding the plaintiff an interim counsel fee based on the apparent disparity in the parties' financial circumstances ( seeDomestic Relations Law 237[a]; Rosenbaum v. Rosenbaum, 55 A.D.3d 713, 866 N.Y.S.2d 234;Prichep v. Prichep, 52 A.D.3d at 65–66, 858 N.Y.S.2d 667). However, an interim counsel fee award in the sum of $75,000 is sufficient to ensure that the plaintiff can litigate this action on equal footing with the defendant, and thus we reduce the interim counsel fee awarded by the Supreme Court.

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Chusid v. Silvera
(Oct 2, 2013)