AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GROVER SWEETING, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Defendant.

DAVID N. HURD

APPEARANCES: OLINSKY LAW GROUP
Attorneys for Plaintiff
OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL
Social Security Administration
Region II
Attorneys for Defendant
OF COUNSEL: HOWARD D. OLINSKY, ESQ.
MICHAEL J. TELFER, ESQ.
TOMASINA DiGRIGOLI, ESQ. DAVID N. HURD
United States District Judge










DECISION and ORDER

Plaintiff Grover Sweeting filed this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his application for benefits under the Social Security Act. By Report-Recommendation dated August 6, 2013, the Honorable Christian F. Hummel, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that the Commissioner's decision be affirmed. Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Report-Recommendation.

Based upon a de novo determination of the portions of the Report-Recommendation to which plaintiff objected, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that

1. The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED; and

2. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety.

The Clerk is directed to file a judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________


United States District Judge
Dated: October 15, 2013


Utica, New York.


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Sweeting v. Colvin
(Oct 15, 2013)