Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

VILLAGE OF ELM GROVE v. Richard K. BREFKA.

Douglas James Hoffer, de la Mora & de la Mora, Elm Grove, WI. Andrew Mishlove, Law Offices of Andrew Mishlove, Milwaukee, WI.
Lauren Stuckert, Law Offices of Andrew Mishlove, Glendale, WI.

Attorney Andrew Mishlove has filed a motion requesting that this court issue an order that editorially revises the written decision in the above-entitled matter. Specifically, he requests that the court editorially revise the opinion to reflect in a footnote that “Attorney Mishlove was first retained in the matter subsequent to the time that the ten-day time limit for demanding a refusal hearing was missed.” He avers that “Mr. Brefka, or his predecessor counsel, missed that time limit several months before the date that Attorney Mishlove was retained.”

Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that footnote 3 is editorially revised to add the following paragraph to the beginning of the footnote: “Finally, we note that Attorney Andrew Mishlove first made an appearance in this case subsequent to the time that the ten-day time limit for demanding a refusal hearing had expired. It appears that Mr. Brefka, or his predecessor counsel, missed the time prior to the date of Attorney Mishlove's appearance.” The second paragraph of footnote 3 will then begin, “Further, we note that T the municipal court....”



Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Vill. of Elm Grove v. Brefka
(Oct 22, 2013)