AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

JOSEPH GANT, Plaintiff, v. GLORIA PETERSON, Defendant.

BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN MAG. JUDGE LAURIE J. MICHELSON
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Laurie J. Michelson's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") dated September 5, 2013 [docket entry 19], in which she recommends that the Court grant defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint [docket entry 15]. Although plaintiff filed a motion denominated as a request for an extension of time to file an objection to the R&R [docket entry 20], the Court will construe the motion as an objection pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2) because plaintiff fully addressed the merits of his position.

Having had an opportunity to fully review this matter, the Court finds that the magistrate judge reached the correct conclusions for the proper reasons. While the complaint names Gloria Peterson as the sole party defendant in this matter, it is devoid of any allegations that she participated in the decision to terminate plaintiff more than thirteen years ago. Consequently, plaintiffs claims against defendant are without merit. See Gilmore v. Corr. Corp. of Am., 92 F. App'x 188, 190 (6th Cir. 2004); Frazier v. Michigan, 41 F. App'x 762, 764 (6th Cir. 2002).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Laurie J. Michelson's Report and Recommendation dated September 5, 2013, is hereby accepted and adopted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint is granted. Dated: October 24, 2013


Detroit, Michigan


_______________


BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN


SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Gant v. Peterson
(Oct 24, 2013)