Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The fact that the defendant's statements were not electronically recorded was not a ground to suppress those statements ( see People v. Caballero, 23 AD3d 1031; People v. Boyd, 21 AD3d 1428, 1429; People v. Oglesby, 15 AD3d 888, 889; People v. Martin, 294 AD2d 850; People v. Falkenstein, 288 AD2d 922, 923; People v. Ferguson, 285 AD2d 901, 902; People v. Grimes, 191 AD2d 745).