Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

MICHAEL ANTHONY CARTER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

ORDER

FRANK BULLOCK, District Judge

The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U S C § 636(b) and, on June 3, 2005, was served on the parties in this action. Petitioner objected to the Recommendation.

The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondent's motion to dismiss this action for being filed beyond the one-year limitation period [Pleading No 87] be GRANTED, that Petitioner's motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence [Pleading No 85] be DENIED, and that this action be dismissed with prejudice. A judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order Finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is not issued.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CARTER v. U.S
(Oct 3, 2005)