Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes Docket Number Civil No. 04-317-JE. Motions Motion for summary judgment : Granted Judges Ancer Lee Haggerty Acts Judiciary And Judicial Procedure — United States Magistrate Judges — Court Officers And Employees — Jurisdiction, Powers, And Temporary Assignment See more information ... Smart Summary Please sign up to generate summary. JAMES R. COLEMAN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED ASSOCIATION OF JOURNEYMEN AND APPRENTICES OF THE PLUMBING PIPEFITTING INDUSTRY OF THE U.S. AND CANADA, LOCAL 290, Defendants. ORDER ANCER HAGGERTY, District Judge Magistrate Judge Jelderks referred to this court an Amended Findings and Recommendation in this action (doc. # 66). The Amended Findings and Recommendation recommends that defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. # 30) should be granted as to plaintiff's disparate impact claim, and denied as to plaintiff's disparate treatment claim. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation of the Magistrate. Campbell v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 501 F.2d 196 (9th Cir. 1974). No clear error appears on the face of the record. I adopt the Magistrate Judge's Amended Findings and Recommendation (doc. # 66). Accordingly, defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. # 30) is hereby granted as to plaintiff's disparate impact claim, and denied as to plaintiff's disparate treatment claim. IT IS SO ORDERED.